Thursday, December 29, 2011

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis - an impact video




It is important to be clear about this disease Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, ME. Clarity is something that has been sadly lacking over the years. This short video, under five minutes, brings certain things about ME into sharp focus. It is an "impact video". The first half has Dr. David Bell articulating, in his excellent manner, some of the main symptoms of this illness. The second half focuses on a severely ill ME patient, a young man of 19 years of age.

It is my belief that we, collectively, have to look more closely at the most severely ill ME patients. It is my belief that they harbor, in their severity, the keys to this illness. Most doctors do not see the most severely ill. Kenny De Meirleir, in his trips into Norwegian homes, treats the very ill. Paul Cheney and David Bell also have occasionally seen the severely ill. Perhaps others have - and hats off to them. But by and large, this patient population is isolated from everyone. The severely ill ME patients cannot get to a doctor's office. They languish in darkened rooms, cut off from reality, isolated and often abandoned, without medical care. It seems that no one cares a whit about them. It is these patients on whom we have to focus our attention, both for their sake and for ours. More effort has to be made to "get close to them", although this, in itself, is difficult, under even the best of circumstances.

I know of a number of these patients. I am interested in identifying more of them. Mostly they have the willingness to participate, through testing, in their own betterment - provided that the severity of their situation is taken into consideration. Many already have had testing for immune function, NK cell activity, cytokine disregulation, gut dysbiosis, brain scans and so forth. Consistent testing needs to be applied to these patients using existing parameters - if only to set the stage for future possibilities that will soon arise.

Peter Cairns, whose own sister is ill, has made this film. Peter has both the skill and the ability, born of experience and empathy, to approach these patients, to get close to them without disturbing them too much - for these patients live in a very fragile and vulnerable world.

Most people do not want to take a look in this direction. Most people turn away, including doctors. It is time to toughen up - and to consider these patients, and what they are going through, especially since they might hold the key. Testing of the half-sick (no disrespect here) has not brought clarity. We need to brace up, take a good look and then move in close. While it is difficult it is the only decent and humane thing to do.

This video interview of Dr. David Bell was made in August 2010 at the opening of the Whittemore Peterson Institute building on the Reno, NV campus. The video was a private project.

It occurs to me to add this fine, very moving testimony of Laurel from 2009.

Saturday, December 10, 2011

CFSAC Testimony of Anonymous #3


The testimonies of the recent CFSAC meeting are now online. They can be found
here. Why these meeting cannot be streamed live and put immediately on the internet, I do not know. Much of a person's testimony is attached to his or her physical self, gestures and voice. To get the true feeling one needs to see the person presenting the testimony (when possible). It is so easy, it is done everywhere now. It is part of modern life.

The fact that these meetings were not streamed and made available immediately speaks to an "intention" - and that intention is "not good". The decision goes beyond stupidity and it is very worrisome - very worrisome. Things have meaning, actions have meaning.

The testimonies are worth reading in their entirety as they give a tremendous collective overview of ME/CFS.

If I were to pick one testimony that everyone interested in learning about ME should read, it is the testimony of Anonymous #3 - a person of a great courage. What this woman writes is like the very most precious gold. To mine more, read the CFSAC Spring testimony of Anonymous #3 here.

To the Members of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee:


Thank you for your service and for the recommendations you made at your meeting last May. In particular, I thank you for recommending that “chronic fatigue syndrome” be moved out of the wastebasket R codes of the United States’ next version of the International Classification of Diseases, the ICD- 10-CM.


In my testimony in May, I described my daily life as a severely ill ME patient. I got sick at age 20 and have been ill for more than 17 years; seven of them spent essentially bedbound. I’m sorry to report that I have lost more function since your May meeting. Now I often can’t lift a pillow from the floor to my bed, and I can no longer swing my laptop computer from my bedside table onto my bed. In order for me to lie on my back and type this testimony, one of my parents, who are my caregivers, had to lift and position my computer for each writing session.


Today I would like to tell you about my last doctor’s appointment--the only time I have been able to go downstairs, outside, and leave my home in the past year.


For severe ME patients, leaving one’s home is an extraordinary undertaking that requires weeks of preparation and months of recovery. A week before the appointment, my parents began to fill our van, which they have converted into an improvised ambulance, with items I would need for the trip. The day before the appointment, I struggled through my monthly bath in the tub and my mother washed my hair. Ordinarily, I bathe in my bed and change my nightgown twice a week, with help. Due to my extreme orthostatic intolerance, I can’t sit long enough to shower, even with the aid of a shower chair.


The morning of my appointment I put on street clothes for the first time in several months. This activity so exhausted me that I could not carry a lightweight purse. I tackled the stairs, which are next to my bedroom, by slowly walking down three steps on rubbery legs, then sitting and resting for a couple minutes, then wobbling down three more with support from the railing. From the foot of the stairs I was pushed in my wheelchair out to our porch, where my father had backed up our van to a loading platform he had constructed.


The bright colors of the outdoors dazzled me. After six months mainly spent lying on this mattress in my small bedroom with one window, I wanted to linger on the porch and take in the vast, arching sky, the touch of breeze against my skin, the hum of insects in the sunlit fir trees. But I had to lower my body onto the bed in the back of our van and rest with eyes closed, wearing earplugs to block the noise of traffic, so that I would have enough energy to get through my appointment.


At the hospital, I had to transfer five times. I heaved my leaden body from the van to my wheelchair, then to a bench in the waiting room where I lay motionless as 85-year-olds hurried past me, then back to my wheelchair, and finally to the table in the exam room.


All of this extra movement and sitting upright took so much of my energy that by the time I reached the paper-covered table, I could barely lift my arms. I lay there blinking at the harsh fluorescent light and wincing at the hospital noises: distant machines beeping, conversations, doors opening. I was glad my doctor was 20 minutes late, because the effort of changing from my street clothes into the hospital gown weakened me so much that it was a while before I could speak again.


And what was the result of my enormous effort in getting myself to the doctor? Essentially, nothing. My doctor renewed my prescriptions for thyroid medication and B12 shots, ordered a few routine blood tests--which came back normal--and did a cursory physical exam. Then she told me to come back in a year and walked out. She had no treatment whatsoever to offer for the sickness that has destroyed my life. Can you imagine HIV or MS patients getting minimal medical care only once a year?


At least she didn’t mock me like past doctors who have said such things as, “It must be nice to get so much attention” and “You’ll have a lot more opportunities in your life if you leave your home.” And in fairness, my doctor has been very good about completing paperwork related to my illness.


Back at home, my parents called a young woman from our local emergency squad and asked her to bring a special carry chair with handles so I could be carried up our stairs. While we waited for her, I lay on the futon in my mother’s office downstairs, a room I had not even seen for more than a year.


Many of my old college textbooks were on her shelves, and I stared at their spines, remembering my active life before I got sick. I took a full course- load, worked part-time, jogged daily, volunteered, and happily partied with my friends.


Now I can no longer read books. Now I spend up to ten hours per day resting with eyes closed, about six hours sleeping, and only short periods here and there listening to audiobooks or checking my email.


It took three people to carry me up the stairs in the chair, though my weight is normal. A few times, as they strained and sweated, I thought we would all go tumbling down the stairs. I clung to the banister, remembering how I used to run up and down those stairs all day as a teenager. Even when my ME was more moderate, I could walk up and down them whenever I wanted to.


Finally, I was back in my room, so depleted I could barely turn my head. And here I have remained for the past six months. A few times a day I walk to the bathroom, but mainly I just lie here, listening to the whoosh of my air cleaner. On my computer I see photos of my old friends, who have gone on to careers, marriage, children and beautiful homes. Outside my window, another year goes by.


Members of CFSAC, my doctor can do nothing for me, but you can. You can influence the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and in turn, the government and public at large. I ask you to please pass strong recommendations on the following issues:


1. Promote the study and awareness of severely ill ME patients--those who score below 10 on the Bell Disability Scale.


A. Count them. No one knows how many American ME patients function at my level or below because no one--including the CDC and the CFIDS Association of America--has ever studied us. The CAA, which promotes psychotherapy and exercise as treatments, has chastised severely ill patients for supposed “kinesiophobia” (fear of movement) and advocates mainly for people with mild fatigue or “unwellness.”


B. Study them. Encourage several research studies composed entirely of severe patients, those who function below 10 on the Bell Disability Scale or who require a nursing home level of care, like me. I’m not a scientist, but it’s logical that the underlying pathology(-ies) of ME should be more pronounced in severe patients and therefore easier to detect

in their bodies. Testing severe patients will have “trickle up” benefits for mild and moderate patients.


C. Include them. Severe patients should comprise half the cohort of all research studies to avoid skewing results toward mild patients. In order to include the severely ill, researchers will have to make accommodations such as sending phlebotomists into patients’ homes. I was able to participate in a Whittemore Peterson Institute study, in which I tested positive for HGRVs, because the WPI--under the leadership of Dr. Judy Mikovits--hired a phlebotomist to come into my bedroom and draw my blood. We may not be able to undergo invasive procedures such as spinal taps in our homes, but there’s no reason why we can’t provide blood, stool, saliva and urine samples to researchers. Stop excluding from your studies the very people whose bodies are most likely to yield answers for all ME patients!


D. Publicize them. Making severe patients the public face of ME is an efficient way to get medical professionals, lay people, and government agencies to take this disease seriously. Rather than being seen as an asterisk, afterthought, or anomaly, severe patients should be the focus of newspaper articles, advocacy materials, and the CDC website. As long as high-energy patients--those who can care for themselves and their families and even hold jobs--are seen as typical, the government will continue to starve ME research of funds. This is a disabling disease, and the severely afflicted are the most capable of showing that!


E. Make teachers of them. Medical school students should be required to make house calls to severe ME patients. Most doctors and researchers have no idea how disabling ME can be because virtually all the patients they see have mild/moderate ME. Why? Because severe patients have extreme difficulty traveling to doctors, or can’t travel at all. Even many ME experts have never met a severe patient in person. After seeing us up close, perhaps future doctors won’t dismiss us with “I’m tired too.”


F. Form a CFSAC task force devoted to severe patients. The Secretary of Health and Human Services has repeatedly ignored your resolutions, but there’s no reason why the CFSAC itself can’t create a committee to actualize the above recommendations for these most overlooked and underserved of patients.


2. Ask for a vast increase in funding. As I wrote in May, if our government believes in equal rights for equal disabilities, it must increase funding for ME research by twenty-fold. Even a private endeavor, the poorly named Chronic Fatigue Initiative, is spending $10 million on research--twice what our government outlays for ME or CFS each year. Ask Secretary Sebelius how she can justify spending on Multiple Sclerosis 100 times, per capita, what she spends on ME or CFS, when I am more disabled than anyone I know with MS. Why has our government left us to decompose in our beds?


3. Adopt and promote the new International Consensus Criteria (ICC) for ME, which were published recently in the Journal of Internal Medicine by a panel of 26 respected clinicians and scientists from 13 countries. Researchers must closely adhere to these strict guidelines to create homogeneous cohorts. Note that to receive an ME diagnosis defined by the ICC, a person must function below 50% of normal activity. While this requirement may be too restrictive for diagnosis, it should be observed for research. Doing so will keep the focus on more disabled patients and facilitate the search for biomarkers and treatments.


4. The term “chronic fatigue syndrome” should be phased out. In particular, research using the Empirical Definition--which was co-authored by Bill Reeves, Beth Unger and Suzanne Vernon--should not receive government funding. Research based on this definition is virtually meaningless because it does not correspond to any disease entity but to a hodgepodge of psychiatric conditions, simple tiredness and unwellness. Any research on “chronic fatigue syndrome” must be based on the Canadian Consensus Criteria, which, like the ICC, defines a distinct neuro-immune disease and requires patients to function below 50% of normal activity.


Patients who don’t fulfill the ICC or CCC should not be admitted to studies of either ME or CFS because they confound research results.


Thank you for reading my testimony, which took me five weeks to write because I can concentrate for only short periods.

Friday, December 9, 2011

Congratulations to Dr. Nancy Klimas


In his fine article today, Cort Johnson brings us another piece of very good news. Dr. Nancy Klimas has been recruited away from the University of Miami, where she has been on the faculty for 27 years. She has been hired to direct a new Neuroimmune Treatment and Research Center at Nova Southeastern University in South Florida. This is an amazing and wonderful bit of news.

A hire of this sort means that the hiring institution has carefully planned it out, and has committed the funds (new hires, research dollars, space) to make this happen. They see something in Dr. Klimas - and they are willing to pay for it - and she sees something in them. This is a really great deal for Dr. Klimas - and the directorship has the further advantage that she does not have to leave her "roots". Dr. Klimas remains in South Florida.

As Dr. Klimas says, this is a chance of a lifetime. Dr. Klimas gets to set up and run her own ME/CFS Research and Treatment Center. She certainly has the connections and qualifications to do this. Congratulations to Dr. Nancy Klimas.

One wonders how many of her team Dr. Klimas will be able to take with her, and who will join her new center as researchers or clinicians? The details will emerge in time, but for the moment we can reassure ourselves that all former cooperative research - with Dr Gordon Broderick and Dr. Mary Ann Fletcher - will continue and, most likely, expand.

This is the third American University or University Hospital "Center for ME/CFS" to have been announced or formed in the last six months. This is unheard of in the world of ME/CFS. To this can be added the alliance of Dr. Daniel Peterson's Simmaron Research with Bond University in Australia. All of these "elevated" situations come as somewhat of a surprise in the wake of other difficulties occurring in the research world of ME/CFS.

As Cort points out, Dr. Nancy Klimas is known for her research collaborations. It is a great asset of Dr. Klimas' - and it is not a characteristic of every researcher. She is special in this regard.

No one person is going to solve this illness. It is going to take many fine minds working together - at various labs and clinical settings. This fusion of assets is going to need some hard work to hammer into shape, but the time to accelerate is now. The real hope is that these new research and treatment centers can expand their collaboration - and build a cohesive network. Let us hope that they have the sense to do this. What is happening at various universities - Harvard, Columbia, Nova Southwest University, Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Nevada, Cornell, Duke, Stanford, Bond University - is extraordinary. Somehow they are going to have to be encouraged to work together.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Mt. Sinai ME/CFS conference - Dr. Enlander lecture


Dr. Derek Enlander, who practices medicine in NYC, was instrumental in arranging a one-day ME/CFS conference at Mt. Sinai Hospital on Sunday, November 20, 2011. Dr. Enlander is well known in the ME/CFS community for his devoted work with patients with this illness. Dr. Enlander has provided support and care for thousands of patients in NYC and indeed worldwide. He travels regularly to Ireland and England and attends most ME/CFS conferences, playing a very important role down in the "trenches".

With a recent generous gift to Mt. Sinai Hospital by one of Dr. Enlander's patients, Dwight Merriman, Dr. Enlander wasted no time in getting this research and treatment center at Mt. Sinai underway. In the process he has enlisted three top researchers, two of them previously unknown to ME/CFS research. These researchers are Dr. Eric Schadt, Dr. Miriam Merad, and Dr. Ila Singh. On the clinical side, two well-known ME/CFS researcher/clinicians will be collaborating with Dr. Enlander at Mt. Sinai - Dr Kenny De Meirleir and Dr. David Bell. They will be undertaking various treatment paths, some of which are outlined in Dr. Enlander's lecture. See also Dr. Kenny De Meirleir's lecture on the latest with GcMAF.

Dr. Enlander, ever the gentleman, gave the last lecture of the day on that Sunday. In many ways his lecture functioned as a summation of the day's presentations and pulled various threads together.

Collectively these six lectures at this conference gave those in attendance great hope for the future of ME/CFS research at Mt. Sinai Hospital. The Mt. Sinai ME/CFS Center gives every indication of wanting to work collaboratively to get at this disease. This entire enterprise is exciting news indeed and we have Dr. Derek Enlander and his fine colleagues to thank for it. Let us hope that this small scale, hard-hitting conference idea becomes a regular practice.

The audio and videos of these lectures were done by Peter Cairns and Nicholas Cairns.

Dr. Terry Wahls


I have known about Dr. Terry Wahls and her amazing story for a number of years. Two years ago, I wrote a blog post about her here. In this lecture, in her life, Dr. Wahls presents a "possibility" - she presents something specific that we can do. These ideas are not necessarily new, which is another strength to her proposition. Some things need repeating, and Dr. Wahls does an excellent job.

Many of the posts that I write covering research and treatments for ME/CFS are "abstractions". They are either in the future, just outside of our reach, or perhaps do not meet our requirements. Dr. Wahls presents something different, something on which we can get our grasp. These nutritional ideas are firmly rooted in scientific inquiry.

It is painfully obvious that ME/CFS involves some level of mitochondrial dysfunction. There is no question that mitochondria can be influenced by various factors.

Dr. Terry Wahls does an excellent job in advancing her ideas, born out of her own experience, in the following video.


Sunday, December 4, 2011

Two items - Sunday December 4


A couple of items floated into my field of vision today. The first was an article from the Weekend edition of the Wall Street Journal. It is entitled "Citizen Scientists" with the subtitle - "Ordinary people taking control of their health data, making their DNA public and running their own experiments. Their big question: Why should science be left to the professionals?".

Somehow this sounded familiar.

The article can be found here. It was written by Amy Dockser Marcus. As I was reading it I was reminded of our own Citizen Researcher - Rich van Konynenburg.

Later an anonymous commenter (actually I see now that is was Cristina Montane. Thanks for that.) suggested looking at the youtube film "The New Biology". This video was made by Pacific Biosciences, where Dr. Eric Schadt is Chief Scientific Officer. Dr. Schadt holds a simultaneous position at Mt. Sinai Hospital in NYC as the Director of Genomics and Multiscale Biology. Incidentally, Dr. Schadt is the co-creative director and co-executive producer of this film. He seems to want to get the word out about this systems biology approach. Dr. Schadt is a man in a hurry. Check it out. This film includes many other fascinating voices.